Search for: "Burns v. State of SC" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2021, 11:27 am by Joe Consumer
South Carolina is one of only five states that does not have a hate crimes law, according to campaign group SC Equality, although a recent extension of federal law means there are legal protections for victims of hate crimes in all states. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:56 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Court relied on McDermott International Inc v Burn Standard Co., where the Supreme Court held: “the 1996 Act makes provision for the supervisory role of courts, for the review of the arbitral award only to ensure fairness. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:06 pm by Lucas Paule
(SC S224611), provides some clarity by tackling three burning questions regarding California’s day of rest statutes – Labor Code sections 552 and 556. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:54 am by Joe Consumer
South Carolina is one of only five states that does not have a hate crimes law, according to campaign group SC Equality, although a recent extension of federal law means there are legal protections for victims of hate crimes in all states. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
Simon Power Plant as well as significantly advance its Energy Transition Plan, Michigan State University (MSU) is taking steps to stop burning coal by the end of 2016, with a majority of coal purchasing and burning ending in 2015. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:05 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
Honda has also added hundreds of thousands of vehicles in those same states to an earlier announced recall, including older versions of their three most popular models: the Accord, Civic and CR-V. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:10 pm by Franita Tolson
  It is a swing state; it is the first big primary state (no offense to New Hampshire or SC);  and we will always have Bush v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:26 am by The Legal Blog
 A bench comprising Justice V S Sirpurkar upheld the judgement of Orissa High Court saying that the impugned judgement does not call for any interference from the court. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:03 am by The Legal Blog
State of Punjab [AIR 2001 SC 2828], this Court held that the word ‘dowry’ should be any property or valuable given or agreed to be given in connection with the marriage. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Unfiltered complaints v. investigated complaints: do client a big favor (and the AG too) by providing input early on. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Click Here Norfolk Southern to pay $4M for SC chlorine spill. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:25 pm by Howard Friedman
SC, Jan. 26, 2010) a federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2010 U.S. [read post]