Search for: "Burns v. United Parcel Service, Inc."
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
" Peggy Young was a driver for United Parcel Service (UPS) [corporate website]. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
(hereinafter the B & H law firm), to represent him in the prosecution of an action to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained in March 2005 while working for United Parcel Service due to an allegedly defective condition on a loading dock in Brooklyn. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 5:44 am
(hereinafter the B & H law firm), to represent him in the prosecution of an action to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained in March 2005 while working for United Parcel Service due to an allegedly defective condition on a loading dock in Brooklyn. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
United Parcel Serv., Inc., 272 F.3d 600, 604 (D.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Wilde v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
United Parcel Service, 12-1226, involves a UPS employee who was not permitted to return to work when pregnant because her doctor said she should not lift objects over twenty pounds. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Riparian rights can continue when land is subdivided, creating parcels that are no longer contiguous to the water. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Click Here McWane Inc. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
