Search for: "Burress v. Burress"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2009, 9:18 am
As noted in a decision published today in People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:11 am
And before some wag posts a comment about "it's a start," and compares it to Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:09 pm
Although it is not likely, do New York's weapon statutes go too far as to fly in the face of the Second Amendment as we saw in the District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:21 am
Now, the big Second Amendment case that came down this summer, U.S. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 8:59 am
But he moves on to his big point, using the Supreme Court's new Second Amendment decision -- District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 11:46 am
In Burress v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:29 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 1:34 pm
In an essay forthcoming in a symposium issue of the Syracuse Law Review, I argue that taken at face value, DC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:03 pm
Here's What the Court Decided In IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:51 pm
"The Supreme Court ruled in Miller v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 1:00 am
Song, V. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
Based on the theories sustained in Miller v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
Based on the theories sustained in Miller v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:09 pm
Thanks to a helpful reader, I just discovered that the Second Circuit today handed down its en banc opinion in US v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 12:08 am
The South Florida lawyers blog writes about their blow up and here is a copy of the shocking complaint in Leighton v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 2:22 am
")Two weeks ago, in a post discussing District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 10:38 am
We cannot agree.NFP civil opinions today (2): Paternity of L.M.R.; Joshua Burress v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 12:40 pm
Chevy Chase or Jane Curtin: That's Plaxico Burress, not Roland Burris.Emily: Oh, that's very different. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:44 pm
Similarly, perhaps Second Amendment advocates can and should be able to use the ruling in Miller v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 am
The plaintiffs in this lawsuit argue that the NFL™ is not an employer because the individual teams are considered separate entities under the law, citing to American Needle v. [read post]
