Search for: "Burrow v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
The Office also relies heavily on Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am
Last June, the United States Supreme Court held in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am
Last June, the United States Supreme Court held in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am
Last June, the United States Supreme Court held in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
Lord Hodge who gave the only judgment (with which Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows and Lady Rose agreed) stated (at [33]): “.. the purpose of section 471(3) is to circumvent the difficult issues that can arise in the application of section 471(1). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
§ 102(a)) [3] Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
It invoked Burrow-Giles Lithographic v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:57 am
(Peter Mensch v Louise Mensch, NYSCEF index no. 309381/2017.) [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On 17 and 18 October 2023, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Hodge, Hamblen, Leggatt, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:40 pm
Copyright Office’s denial of a copyright application for a work created using generative AI due to lack of human authorship (Thaler v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:08 am
For example, in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:08 am
For example, in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:08 am
For example, in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) and Goldstein v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [4] See Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Burrows has publicly reiterated that DEI initiatives that were legal prior to SFFA remain so. [read post]
