Search for: "Burrows v. Burrows" Results 181 - 200 of 312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2013, 4:30 am by INFORRM
That’s a quote from NZ’s leading textbook on media law (Burrows and Cheer, Media Law in NZ, 6ed, 288) citing authoritative UK and Australian authority. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:55 am
I’m not sure that anybody had any idea what the Courts were going to invent out of Housing Act 1985 in Burrows and after, let alone intend it. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the facts as alleged in the complaint showed that the employer’s recording system did not further the use of the telephone, it did not meet the first prong of the “business extension exception” to the Federal Wiretap Act, ruled a federal district court in Illinois, and so the employee stated a plausible claim for relief under the Act (Burrow v Sybaris Clubs International, Inc, November 8, 2013, Leinenweber, H). [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 [*3]Since the remaining allegations in the complaint were flatly refuted by the defendant’s documentary evidence, we agree with the Supreme Court’s determination to grant the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint (see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 757-758; Weissman v Kessler, 78 AD3d 465, 466; Katebi v Fink, 51 AD3d 424, 425; Pacella v Whiteman Osterman… [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:31 am by Venkat
Other coverage: (Threat Post): LinkedIn Data Breach Lawsuit Dismissed Related posts: Class Action Against Path Over Cellphone Address Book Access Keeps GoingJudge Koh Whittles Down iPhone App Privacy LawsuitData Breach Claim Survives Based on Allegation of Misuse of Personal Information -- Burrows v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In relation to the tort gateway issue, Lord Lloyd-Jones (with whom Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, and Lord Burrows agree) gave the lead judgment. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The majority of the Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden and Lord Burrows) allow Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Issue 2, the majority, Lady Arden, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows, allows the appeal with Lord Sales and Lord Hodge dissenting. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]