Search for: "Burrows v. State of La*"
Results 21 - 40
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
It invoked Burrow-Giles Lithographic v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
L&Q -v- Ansell appears to state that, once the arrears and costs set out in the Possession Order have been paid, the occupier ceases to be a ‘tolerated trespasser’ in the sense of Burrows because their occupation is no longer subject to s.85 Housing Act 1985 - either in terms of execution of the order or possible application for variation of the order. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am
The majority of the Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden and Lord Burrows) allow Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:27 am
” Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Furthermore, with respect to the Emerson defendants, it is undisputed that they were not present when the allegedly defamatory statement was made and, significantly, the complaint is bereft of any allegations setting forth a basis to hold them liable for Burrows’s statement (see Bostich v United States Trust Corp., 233 AD2d 193, 194). [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
In Gulati v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:01 am
Burrows, 2012-Ohio-5995 (9th Dist.) [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 9:38 am
In Burrows v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am
Here, the plaintiff’s conclusory allegations were insufficient to state a cause of action alleging violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Klein v Rieff, 135 AD3d 910, 912 [2016]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759 [2014]). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
The Office also relies heavily on Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Plaintiffs assert a variety of state and federal law claims. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:47 am
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action for violations of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Ehrenkranz v 58 MHR, LLC, 159 AD3d 872, 872; Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759). [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Sarony in SCt Burrow-Giles case neve… -> RT @IPLawAlerts: Who Owns the Patent? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
State law claims: Yunker’s state law claims also suffer from a variety of deficiencies. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:16 am
According to the complaint in Burrows v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:47 am
Employers in states without such laws should closely watch Burrows v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 pm
” False Advertising: The court says that she adequately states a claim under California’s false advertising statute as well, largely based on the allegations that support the UCL claim. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:54 am
In April 2013, the Southern District of Florida preliminarily approved a proposed settlement in Burrows v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 pm
PCT/GB01/00901 to Burrow (“Burrow reference”). [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 4:30 am
Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615; Armstrong v Blank Rome LLP, 126 AD3d 427; Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]