Search for: "Burrows v. State of La*"
Results 41 - 60
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
In her statement, Ms Shaw accepted that Mr Sykes did not kill or otherwise cause the death of Ms Sykes and Ms Burrows (his ex-partner), nor did he mentally and physically abuse Ms Sykes and Ms Burrows. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am
Here, the plaintiff’s conclusory allegations were insufficient to state a cause of action alleging violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Klein v Rieff, 135 AD3d 910, 912 [2016]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759 [2014]). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
From Borkowski v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
The question whether mere consequential loss satisfies the tort gateway had been considered before by the Supreme Court in the very same case: Brownlie v Four Seasons [2017] UKSC 80; [2018] 2 All ER 91 (“Brownlie I”). [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Lord Burrows stated the illegitimacy of the threat would have been determined with reference to the justification for the demand. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:41 am
In relation to the tort gateway issue, Lord Lloyd-Jones (with whom Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, and Lord Burrows agree) gave the lead judgment. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm
A Legal Analysis of Burrows v Houda [2020] NSWDC 485, Priya Singh, University of KwaZulu-Natal. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:58 am
Nevertheless, there seems to be a lack of appreciation of problems that may attend the interpretation of emoji, such as we have recently (and commendably) seen in an Australian case, Burrows v Houda, [2020] NSWDC 485. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am
These principles (as approved and slightly amended by Blindley Heath Investments Ltd & Anor v Bass [2015] EWCA Civ 1023 (“Blindley Heath”)) were referred to in Lord Burrows’ Supreme Court judgment: It is not enough that the common assumption is merely understood by the parties in the same way. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am
The majority of the Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden and Lord Burrows) allow Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:31 am
On the other side has been the Marxist-Leninist camp, joined by elements of developing states. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:14 am
The appeal was heard on 8 February 2021 before Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
In Gulati v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
United States USA today had a piece “Newsmax apologizes for airing false allegations against Dominion worker, who drops company from suit”. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
