Search for: "Burton v. Bell"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2008, 10:12 am
On July 16, 2008, a Marion County Circuit Court jury unanimously found the PERS Board liable for over $200,000 in damages for negligent misrepresentations made to a PERS member in the case of Kay Bell v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
The recently published Removal of bells from a closed church considers two judgments relating to St James, Church Kirk in the Blackburn Diocese; the earlier case, Re St James Church Kirk [2019] ECC Bla 4, suggested that the designation of “church treasure” was not appropriate in relation to one of the church’s bells [12, 13]. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 1:26 am
Burton NASAU COUNTYReal Property Former Homeowner Has No Equity in Property; Deed Conveyed All Rights, Title, Interest to Plaintiff DeRoche v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions simplifiée, 2013 FCA 219 at paragraph 65; Mylan… [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:41 am
A legal fiction equivalent to unringing the bell, which flies contrary to human experience. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
Sandford, and Plessy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
The Eighth Circuit Historical Society has an online video commemorating Gideon v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
A district attorney failed to follow the precise language of the Constitution in Burton v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
Bell Atlantic Corp. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
Data privacy and data protection The ICO have reprimanded Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust for a computer system failure that resulted in the referrals of nearly 5,000 patients being delayed or lost. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am
The next day, he discussed the Constitution and Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 2:44 pm
"] From Burns v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
As the US Supreme Court remarked in The Telephone Cases, if it were true that Bell’s patent granted him a practical monopoly, this would “show more clearly the great importance of his discovery, but it will not invalidate his patent” 126 US 1, 535. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
