Search for: "Bush v. City of Albany"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 12:56 pm
Common Council of the City of Albany (Judge Pigott dissents regarding standing issue in SEQRA matter). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
City of New York, 115 F.Supp.2d 423, 428 (S.D.N.Y.2000); Olivia Y. ex rel. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 7:34 am
In Save the Pine Bush v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:25 am
Common Council of the City of Albany [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
** In Friends of Pine Bush v Planning Bd. of City of Albany (71 AD2d 780), Appellate Division, Third Department, found that "[a]s residents of the city, the individual petitioners are persons aggrieved by a decision of the planning board and thus have standing to bring this proceeding", while in Zehner v Board of Educ. of the Jordan-Elbridge Cent. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:34 pm
Common Council of the City of Albany (Judge Pigott dissents regarding standing issue in SEQRA matter). [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:30 am
Common Council of the City of Albany, in which five of the seven members of the high court made clear that the lower courts had taken an 18-year detour from what their predecessors had intended in Society of the Plastics Industry v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm
In Matter of Save the Pine Bush v Common Council of the City of Albany, the Court held that both the individual petitioners and the organization had standing to challenge an action that allegedly threatened certain endangered species within the Pine Bush area. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm
In Matter of Save the Pine Bush v Common Council of the City of Albany, the Court held that both the individual petitioners and the organization had standing to challenge an action that allegedly threatened certain endangered species within the Pine Bush area. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
Under the circumstances, petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the rezoning was arbitrary, unreasonable or unlawful (see Matter of Citizens for Responsible Zoning v Common Council of City of Albany, 56 AD3d at 1062). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
Under the circumstances, petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the rezoning was arbitrary, unreasonable or unlawful (see Matter of Citizens for Responsible Zoning v Common Council of City of Albany, 56 AD3d at 1062). [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Hobby Lobby Stores Bush v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It appears possible that this case may be decided on the same basis as the Bush v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
Circuit opinion of Seven-Sky v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 7:35 am
Battle underscore the unwillingness of the Bush Administration to get tough on gun vendors who violate federal law. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
Bush appointee.) [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
