Search for: "Bush v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2004, 3:34 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled that Guantanamo Bay detainees seeking to challenge their imprisonment must do so in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 7:42 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court held in Boumediene v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:44 pm
District of Columbia, 2008 U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 12:37 pm
[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] on Thursday ordered the release [order, PDF] of five Algerian Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainees. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:37 am
Bush. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 6:37 am
Bush [text] grants... [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 9:19 pm
In early October, a judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] ordered the release of the detainees [opinion and order, PDF; JURIST report], [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:30 am
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Friday in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 5:07 am
We refer to the amicus brief that Solicitor General Paul Clement filed Friday in support of the plaintiffs in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:21 pm
[JURIST] Chief Justice Royce Lamberth [official profile] of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held an off-the-record meeting Wednesday with defense lawyers for enemy combatants being held at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] to discuss court procedures in light of the US Supreme Court's recent opinion in Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 11:53 am
Bush [Duke Law backgrounder [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:57 pm
The ongoing case of Partington v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:09 pm
Heller , like Bush v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:14 pm
National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:50 am
Bush have no reasonable expectation of privacy, a federal judge has ruled.In George Lardner v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 10:55 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia in Khadr v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, as we did in 2000 with Bush v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
Of possible tangential value to embassies and consulates is the United States District Court for the District of Columbia decision of September 19, 2007 in the matter Menachem Binyamin Zivitofsky et al. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:33 pm
The defendant moved to dismiss the charges on the basis that the statute was unconstitutional as a result of the United States Supreme Court's decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 9:35 am
District of Columbia, have on the upcoming 2008 elections? [read post]
