Search for: "Bush v. Executive Branch United States et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:35 am
Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, a designated terrorist organization, and two of its attorneys (collectively, 'Al-Haramain') brought suit against President Bush and other executive branch agencies and officials. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 8:06 am
It is well known, and true, that over the course of those seven years, the Bush administration steadily tightened detention standards as a result of press scrutiny, internal Executive branch reforms, congressional statutes like the Detainee Treatment Act, and judicial pushback. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
As United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
Circuit Court and the Executive Branch. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
(See here for the executive branch’s most complete statement of why it believes the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs are properly construed to apply to the armed conflict against the Islamic State.) [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm
Yousuf, et al. (08-1555). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:09 pm
The case, Saleh et al v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Government is not a party to this defamation lawsuit—Victor Restis et al. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
If the Supreme Court were to rely on the concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 4:34 pm
From the Justice Department's January 2002 memo on the Application of Treaties and Laws to al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees, (available here), the exercise of the United States, right to international self-defense under Article 51 of the U.N. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:53 am
And there are those who think John Yoo, et al., might actually be tried in such a court. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 9:32 am
Bush (ACLU et al., v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:25 am
The one remaining case on the docket — a case involving more than 150 detainees — is Khadr, et al., v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
A Lot of Reporters Must Be Calling Al Qaeda (May 15, 2006)101. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
In his remarks on the amendment, Hutchinson indicated that it was designed to address “the growing threat that the People’s Republic of China poses to the citizens of the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:13 pm
(The lead case is Al Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy In Boumediene et al. v. [read post]
