Search for: "Bush v. Kerr" Results 21 - 40 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am by Elina Saxena
He argued that Savage overstates the decline of the NSC “lawyers group” during the Bush administration. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
District Court for the District of Columbia has issued an injunction against the NSA's bulk metadata collection program in Klayman v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm
In Bush’s case, the Supreme Court had wrongly made him President in Bush v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane noted that the appellees in Klayman v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:00 am by Peter Margulies
Bush) subtly counters the glib claims of NSA critics, embraced by the Presidential Review Group, that the selection of FISC judges requires reform. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:37 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court declined to hear an unusual challenge to the program by the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which had sought to bypass lower courts.ADDED: Orin Kerr has some sharp analysis:Judge Leon’s first and most fundamental move is to distinguish Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 11:43 pm by Orin Kerr
The story has at least one of the Justices comparing today’s rift to their rift after Bush v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Bush and its legacy on July 17th. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:43 pm by Orin Kerr
It’s true that a group of OT2000 clerks leaked the details of the deliberations in Bush v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am by Guest Blogger
Bush for his vigilance as “a clear-eyed guardian of the Constitution” -- upheld the Affordable Care Act as constitutional. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:12 pm by Orin Kerr
” A sample statement from the left: “The activist Justices in the Bush v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
Turning to the substance of the Affordable Care Act challenges, at the Volokh Conspiracy Orin Kerr compares the Act with President Bush’s strategy for the war on terror, explaining that “both policies boil down to judicial deference versus constitutional norms seen as embedded in the text. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:49 pm by Orin Kerr
In a 2010 essay in the Washington Post, Randy acknowledged that “the smart money” was against the mandate challenge and recognized that the prospect that the Court might strike down the mandate might seem “far-fetched,” but suggested that it just might happen if the stars aligned as they did in Bush v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:44 pm by Orin Kerr
By the following year, a district court judge had cited Barnett in his opinion striking down health care reform, and Barnett himself had left behind his March 2010 conclusion that the Supreme Court would need to risk its credibility in a politically charged case, Bush v. [read post]