Search for: "Bustillos v. Murphy (2002)" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
California Supreme Court Clarifies That The Restriction On Implied Public Dedications On Non-Coastal Property Set Forth In Civil Code Section 1009(b) Is Not Limited to Recreational Uses Only.
5 Nov 2017, 10:40 am by Miles Dolinger
Murphy, (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1280–81).) [read post]
Real Estate and Land Use Blog - http://www.dolingerlaw.com/blog
“But Everyone Is Driving Over My Land!” No Public Use Of Non-Coastal Private Real Property Can Ever Ripen Into An Implied Dedication.
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Murphy (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 1277.) [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
“But Everyone Is Driving Over My Land!” No Public Use Of Non-Coastal Private Real Property Can Ever Ripen Into An Implied Dedication.
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Murphy (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 1277.) [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
7th Circuit Says Vienna Convention Argument is Still Valid
11 Sep 2008, 5:21 am by stu@crimapp.com
Aceves, Murphy v. [read post]
Michigan Criminal Appeals - http://www.crimapp.com/index.php
Court of Appeal Disagrees With Other Courts And Holds That California Civil Code Section 1009 Bars All Use Of Private Real Property From Developing Into An Implied Public Dedication, Not Just Recreational Use.
3 Nov 2015, 9:09 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Murphy (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1280-1281. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Statutory Prohibition Against Acquiring Public Recreation Easements By Prescription Does Not Apply Where The Easement Is Used By Private Persons To Access Their Own Property That They Use For Recreational Purposes
21 Apr 2015, 9:49 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The court distinguished Bustillos v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/