Search for: "Butterfield v. State of Oregon"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2020, 7:04 pm
The stipulated dismissal did not mention costs or attorney fees, and Butterfield subsequently moved for attorney fees under the Patent Laws (section 285) as well as FRCP 54(d) and Oregon state statute. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court case that upheld sobriety checkpoints (Michigan v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
” Perez v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Butterfield & Stamford, LLC). [read post]