Search for: "Buttermore v. Aliquippa Hosp." Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Aliquippa Hosp., 561 A.2d 733 (Pa. 1989) to be distinguishable because Buttermore did not involve UIM benefits.The Court also rejected the UIM carrier's reliance on the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas case of Crisp v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Aliquippa Hosp., 561 A.2d 733 (Pa. 1989) to be distinguishable because Buttermore did not involve UIM benefits.The Court also rejected the UIM carrier's reliance on the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas case of Crisp v. [read post]