Search for: "Butterworth v. Butterworth"
Results 61 - 80
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
G v E & Ors [2010] EWHC 3385 (Fam) (21 December 2010) – Read judgment Manchester City Council has been ordered to pay the full legal costs of a 20-year-old man with severe learning disabilities who was unlawfully removed from his long-term foster carer. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Burlington, MA Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
In her discussion of the recent decision in Metropolitan Schools v Designtechnica ([2010] EWHC 2411 (QB)) – posted by us on 30 October – Siobhain Butterworth draws attention to the oddity of the case. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm
I know the court of appeal (and for that matter Tugendhat) quoted Strasbourg cases including Pfeifer v Austria – decided after Jameel – as authority for the proposition that Article 8 encompasses the right to reputation, but how much weight should it be given in a case dealing with defamatory allegations made against a public servant? [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
” 21 July | Frans Cornelis Adrianus VAN ANRAAT v the Netherlands (European Court of Human Rights) A man was prosecuted for supplying thiodiglycol (mustard gas) to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
Update 3/8/10: Siobhain Butterworth in the Guardian: “And so we return to the Press Association’s quest to persuade the court of protection to allow the media to name the local authority rebuked in G v E. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:03 pm
In the case of Mink v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
The well-known and much used defence arises from the 1999 case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers in which the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) extended the defence of qualified privilege to cover the media. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
The view of the learned editors of Duncan & Neill (Duncan and Neil on Defamation (Butterworths, 3rd edition, 2009), at 17.26. is that it can but the better view, which was assumed to be the case by at least two of their lordships in Reynolds (at 201 and 193-5 per Lord Nicholls and 237-8 per Lord Hobhouse.) is that it cannot. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:12 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Highland Financial Partners LP & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 809 (14 July 2010) Autofocus Ltd v Accident Exchange Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 788 (14 July 2010) Quinn Direct Insurance Ltd v The Law Society of England and Wales [2010] EWCA Civ 805 (14 July 2010) Harris v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors [2010] EWCA Civ 808 (15 July 2010) Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co- Operative Ltd [2010]… [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:01 am
About 6 degrees off-beam should be okay (see Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith, here). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Siobhain Butterworth is a lawyer. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
Judgment in Khader v Aziz, was given on 23 June 2010. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:40 pm
In last week’s case (Friedmann v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:34 pm
; R. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:14 am
It stressed the reliability of the Canadian Encyclopedic Digest and touched briefly on Butterworths Ontario Digest and the Canadian Abridgement. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
See Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:04 am
Also just out is the fifth edition of the Butterworths E-Commerce and Information Technology Law Handbook, of which IPKat team member Jeremy is Consultant Editor. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:32 pm
In R. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
(Markham, Ont.: Butterworths, 2002); Lewis N. [read post]
