Search for: "Butts v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2009, 8:24 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit gave tobacco giant Philip Morris the word this week: cigarette advertising is protected by the 1st Amendment, selling cigarettes isn't--no butts about it.In Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:59 am by SHG
Well then, I guess we can all sleep well tonight, as long as it's not our butt on the line. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:05 am
USA    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0296n.06 USA v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:05 am
USA    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0296n.06 USA v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  An appeal against a decision of Langstaff J  [2018] 3 WLR 691 17 or 18 October 2018, Butt v The Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:58 am by Lorene Park
For example, two incidents of alleged “butt-touching” on one day, even considering that the employee who was touched alleged that other employees told her of several similar but unreported incidents, simply were not objectively severe enough to alter the terms and conditions of her employment, concluded a federal district court in Alabama, granting summary judgment to the employer on her hostile work environment claim (Stallworth v Guyoung Tech USA, Inc). [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
United States District Court Judge James Robertson for the District of Columbia, issued an order in USA v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari in Carpenter v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: The World and Everything in It features discussions of Ziglar v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Jeff Gamso
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Check out ADR Prof Blog's take on this article from here.Another article deals with the validity of religious arbitrations in USA and UK. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:01 am by SHG
 USA Today’s Brad Heath twitted a great quote** from United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Butts & Johnson, Sentinel Insurance Company administered by The Hartford, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]