Search for: "By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN"
Results 221 - 240
of 282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2009, 7:17 am
Finally, for a provocative contrarian take, check out Andrew Ross Sorkin’s piece in Tuesday’s NYT: So here is a sobering thought: Maybe we have to swallow hard and pay up, partly for our own good. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 12:01 pm
I’m thinking of some recent articles, including one by the inimitable Andrew Ross Sorkin entitled “Fixing the ‘Brain Damage’ Caused by the I.P.O. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 5:05 pm
Too Big To Fail (2009) by Andrew Ross Sorkin (reviewed February 25, 2010);21. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:04 am
Too Big to Fail: The Inside Story of How Wall Street and Washington Fought to Save the Financial System—and Themselves by Andrew Ross Sorkin. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 7:57 am
CNBC commentator Andrew Ross Sorkin observed that if any digital assets reached "escape velocity," it could upend the idea of a monopoly that the U.S. or any government has on currency. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:03 pm
Federal Reserve Chairman during the Carter and Reagan administrations, and, most recently, former Chairman of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board under President Barack Obama; and Andrew Ross Sorkin, New York Times columnist and author of the 2009 non-fiction novel upon which the movie was based. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:53 am
The New York Times weighed in as well, including an August 20 write-up by Andrew Ross Sorkin, IMHO one of the best business journalists around, in which he noted “[s]hareholder democracy seemed like a good idea at the time [but] what we got was shareholder supremacy. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:07 am
Here’s Andrew Ross Sorkin: Its goal is noble: start-ups and small businesses are the lifeblood of our economy, and it is hard to argue with helping entrepreneurs build businesses and hire employees. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:08 am
("Why LinkedIn's Price May Have Been Right," Andrew Ross Sorkin, NY Times). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:25 pm
A recent report by Andrew Ross Sorkin in the New York Times Dealbook suggested that most of Goldman's customers were staying put. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:43 am
These news reports echo Andrew Ross Sorkin who raised the question last year of whether shareholder activists target women CEOs, noting that although only 23 women lead companies in the S&P 500, nearly a quarter of them have been in the crosshairs of shareholder activists. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:43 am
These news reports echo Andrew Ross Sorkin who raised the question last year of whether shareholder activists target women CEOs, noting that although only 23 women lead companies in the S&P 500, nearly a quarter of them have been in the crosshairs of shareholder activists. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:25 am
Andrew Ross Sorkin noticed the same thing I did: Having said all that, there is something mystifying in the statement that Gary Naftalis, Mr. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:44 am
Too Big to Fail: The Inside Story of How Wall Street and Washington Fought to Save the Financial System—and Themselves by Andrew Ross Sorkin. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:43 pm
A New York Times article by Andrew Ross Sorkin notes that even with 750 terms, the glossary is incomplete: "The firm’s compendium isn’t comprehensive, though: While it has definitions for 'material adverse change,' 'Rule 144a offering' and 'white knight,' it lacks definitions for more au courant terms like' collateralized debt obligation' and 'credit default swap.'" According to an… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:52 am
Too Big to Fail: The Inside Story of How Wall Street and Washington Fought to Save the Financial System—and Themselves by Andrew Ross Sorkin. [read post]
3 May 2017, 12:36 pm
In 291 pages, the book gives a rich history of shareholder activism that has been described as “a grand story” and an “illuminating read” by the Wall Street Journal, “a revelation” by the Financial Times, and “an excellent read” by Andrew Ross Sorkin at the New York Times. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 5:39 am
In The New York Times, Andrew Ross Sorkin discusses cases in which some Justices have owned stock in companies that have filed amicus briefs and the possibility that the stocks could be held in a blind trust owned by third parties. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:33 pm
The always interesting Andrew Ross Sorkin notes that even when the Fed grudgingly agreed let JPMorgan pay more for Bear,the Fed's fingerprints were all over the new pact. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 5:53 am
Even though I can understand why paying $165 million in guaranteed bonuses (plus another $239 million later) to wind down $2.7 trillion in risky derivatives (now wound down to 1.7 trillion) could make sense to a board (as Andrew Ross Sorkin argues), I'm still having trouble buying into the arguments made in this letter from AIG's CEO Edward Liddy and AIG's White Paper for these reasons: 1. [read post]
