Search for: "By PETER LATTMAN"
Results 321 - 340
of 420
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2012, 4:41 am
I found this quote interesting: As dispatches from my Times colleague Peter Lattman have made abundantly clear, Dewey collapsed under the weight of a toxic combination of high leverage, lavish financial guarantees to many partners and faltering revenue. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 7:59 pm
Peter Lattman at the WSJ's Law Blog has a wonderful series of guest author posts welcoming 1L's to law school. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:17 am
” Peter Lattman of the New York Times reported that a $125 million bond offering did not disclose special compensation guarantees mentioned above. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 3:28 am
Posted by Peter Lattman at the Law Blog of The Wall Street Journal Having spent an entire career living within what I considered to be overly restrictive time and word limits on voir dire, opening statements, closing arguments, appellate briefs and appellate arguments it is hard for me to accept that some litigants are permitted to write novels to express their points on appeal. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:50 pm
(Here’s more on the bankruptcy from WSJ’s bankruptcy guru Jeff McCracken and LB alum Peter Lattman.) [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:39 am
” At the DealBook blog of the New York Times, Peter Lattman identifies several former Supreme Court clerks who have made their way to Wall Street. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 1:10 pm
[1] Post of Peter Lattman, "It's Springtime for Baseball….and Lawsuits! [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 2:26 pm
Peter Lattman's Law Blog in The Wall Street Journal responded, asking online subscribers: "Did Barry Barnett Invent the Phrase 'Eat What You Kill? [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 6:29 am
" And thanks to Peter Lattman, the Journal's law beat reporter. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 6:42 am
Click here for the WSJ story, written by Tamara Audi and the erstwhile Law Blogger, Peter Lattman. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm
” Lattman notes that Mr. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:21 am
Peter Lattman and Ashby Jones over at the WSJ Law Blog have been following the developments in the case closely (see also here), as has Kevin LaCroix, Peter Henning, and Roger Parloff, among others. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Twombly, making it more difficult for private plaintiffs to file antitrust claims against large companies; Professor Scott Dodson weighs in here at Civil Procedure Prof Blog; at Volokh Conspiracy, Einer Elhauge has these thoughts; Patti Waldmeir of the Financial Times has this story; in the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports here (subscription req'd); and Peter Lattman has this post at the WSJ.com Law Blog. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 12:23 am
As Peter Lattman noted in his Times article to which I l [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:41 pm
" Which leads to my next point: Peter Lattman reports that Mike Dillon, the GC of Sun, predicts that "The traditional law-firm model is going the way of the Mastodon. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Peter Lattman has been reporting from Mississippi this week and producing some really good stuff, putting thoughts into my head that if my kids were on Christmas break right now I'd get my family on a plane for the Magnolia state and live blog this sucker for a couple weeks. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:07 am
Regarding Clarence Thomas (David Bernstein @ Volokh)Witness for the Persecution (Eugene Robinson at Washington Post)Anita Hill reemerges, as she must, to respond to the Clarence Thomas memoir (Ann Althouse)Anita Hill Fights Back (Peter Lattman @ WSJ Law Blog)An Angry Justice Thomas Targets Liberal Groups (ABA Journal)Addendum:ABC Sympathetically Spins 'Withering' Media Attacks on Anita Hill (Scott Whitlock, NewsBusters)Justice Thomas: I'm not "bitter", you… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:39 am
Click here for Peter Lattman’s story in the WSJ. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:32 pm
In yesterday's New York Times, this op-ed by David Lat discussed the "gargantuan" bonuses awarded to Supreme Court law clerks; Peter Lattman weighs in here at the WSJ.com Law Blog. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 1:02 pm
Peter Lattman at the WSJ Law Blog asks whether a lawyer's reporting the name of person in a coma then passing away a few weeks shy of his 25th birthday in hope that the victims family calls the lawyer is fair game or gives the plaintiffs bar a bad name? [read post]
