Search for: "C/O Givens"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
Other nonimmigrant categories allow for quasi dual intent such as the O, E-1, E-2, and P categories. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
As evident from the cross-reference in Article 17(1)(c), Article 20(3) forms part of the rules determining the admissibility of a case before the ICC. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
Given that distinctive aspect of the professional liability policy, it was always going to be an uphill battle for Schulman to establish coverage under the policy. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
Judge Kaplan ruled that, given this ruling, Trump cannot argue that he did not rape Carroll in the mid-1990s. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 2:57 am
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 4:41 am
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 6:55 am
Among federal safety regulations to protect against amputations are: 29 CFR Part 1910 Subparts O and P (machinery and machine guarding); 29 CFR 1926 Subpart I (hand tools and power tools); 29 CFR Part 1928 Subpart D; 29 CFR Part 1915 Subparts C, H, and J; and 29 CFR Part 1917 Subparts B, C, and G. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
In this respect it might be relevant to mention that nowhere in the South African application is it mentioned that Hamas embedded itself within the civilian population in Gaza strip, systematically using civilians and civilian infrastructure as human shields, and effectively rendering it impossible for any attack directed against its military apparatus not to cause significant collateral damage; and (c) given Israel’s capacity to inflict much more harm to civilians in… [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm
It states as follows: Part B (Zero-Point Offenders) Subpart 1 (Adjustment for Certain Zero-Point Offenders) Chapter Four is amended by inserting at the end the following new Part C: PART C ― ADJUSTMENT FOR CERTAIN ZERO-POINT OFFENDERS 4C1.1. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 7:44 am
Two filings in this case list Robe Probe as "c/o Justice Clinic" with different addresses in Schaumburg, Illinois. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Indeed, it was only some weeks ago that the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) made a referral (Mio, C-580/23) [IPKat here and here] to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) asking how the assessment of originality needs to be conducted, specifically having regard to works of applied art.Now it is the turn of the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Germany also to make a CJEU referral on essentially the same issues. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
§ 230(c)(1). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
RIAs must provide a copy of the updated Form ADV Part 2A brochure and Part 2B brochure supplement (or a summary of changes with an offer to provide the complete brochure) to each “client” and, if applicable, Part 3 (Form CRS: Client Relationship Summary) to each “retail investor” with which the RIA has entered into an investment advisory contract. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
Violation of this paragraph is a Class C crime. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The assumption seems reasonable given that PitchBook does not report race. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
§ 271(c) (emphasis added). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
The Hearing Officer at the UKIPO found that the use of an ANN engages the ‘program for a computer’ exclusion and refused grant (BL O/542/22). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am
Because defendant was “not given the prior opportunity or at trial to challenge or cross-examine officials from Verizon, who had purportedly accumulated this evidence . . . their admission as such violated Defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Sorel-Tracy (Ville de) c. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
