Search for: "C Hemphill"
Results 61 - 79
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
Nonempirical line of Qs is empirical too in some sense b/c we have to decide when we want to make marks incontestable and what that will mean, and whether we want a category of arbitrary marks. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Jane Ginsburg: emerging concepts of IP rights and limitations; each paper paired with commentary from a different jurisdiction, usually US/EU. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
The firm: They don’t have the externalities problem b/c they internalize benefits of buying. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Hemphill of Bergkamp & Hemphill, P.C., Adel, for appellee.) [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:54 pm
Scott Hemphill and Jeannie Suk). [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 9:10 am
[71]Hemphill, supra note 29, at 439-40. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
An article by Professor C. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
See pages 133-134 of: Testimony of C. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
See pages 133-134 of: Testimony of C. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Gormley, Dallas Micah C. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Gormley, Dallas Micah C. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
But causality is difficult b/c there are so many breaches—even if you experience identity theft, which breach led to that theft? [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Trade Secrets Jeannie Fromer Trade secret and patent are not as absolute as we imagine them in terms of disclosure/openness. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
TM is concerned with one kind of generalization: source information—who is responsible b/c of the presence of mark. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Jorge C. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
For the Crown to prove that an indecent act has been committed, according to the seminal case R v Labaye (2005, SCC 80 (CanLII), [2005] 3 SCR 728) the Crown must show that: By its nature, the conduct at issue causes harm or presents a significant risk of harm to individuals or society in a way that undermines or threatens to undermine a value reflected in and thus formally endorsed through the Constitution or similar fundamental laws by, for example: a) confronting members of the public with… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
IPSC 2010 Preliminary notes: (1) Usual caveats: I’m missing a lot of interesting stuff, including the things running opposite my own panel; I am not a patent scholar; these are my incomplete notes and my own perspective [read post]
