Search for: "C I Host, Inc"
Results 41 - 60
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2023, 6:50 pm
I recently spoke with Tony Martignetti, host of Nonprofit Radio, about this summer’s Supreme Court decision on affirmative action in college admissions and the possible implications for nonprofits and their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:53 pm
By Eric Goldman Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
C. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:32 am
is not binding on the court but often predicts the likely result :Advocate General's Opinion in Joined Cases C-236/08, C-237/08 and C-238/08Google France & Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier, Google France v Viaticum & Luteciel and Google France v CNRRH, Pierre-Alexis Thonet, Bruno Raboin & Tiger, franchisée Unicis"..Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 11:29 am
In general, I think third party apps fits the 512 paradigm neatly--either 512(c) if Facebook hosts the app or 512(d) if Facebook links to the app. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:30 am
C., Cert. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 3:04 am
Airbnb, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
Haitian Centers Council, Inc., Nixon v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:46 am
Mitchell International, Inc., No. 17-656 C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
Code §1030(g), 1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(I). [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 11:59 am
By Eric Goldman LiveUniverse, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:47 pm
Google, Inc., 3:09-cv-00538-WS-EMT (N.D. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm
Facebook, Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 12:38 pm
§ 230(c)(2). [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 10:57 pm
But I think the same "duty to police" theory may apply under the core of the safe harbor itself, Section 512(c)(1)(A)(ii). [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:02 am
Perich last Wednesday raised a host of difficult and important questions — and a few misconceptions. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
Well, I made the Daily Meal’s “50 Most Powerful People in Food” again. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:27 pm
Ripple Labs Inc., Docket C.A. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm
As I suggested in my commentary on the first instance decision in Tamiz v Google, this looks like the death throes of that aspect of Godfrey v Demon Internet.A publisher post-notificationAt first instance Eady J held that Google was not a publisher even after notification of the existence of a defamatory comment to a blog that it hosted. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:58 am
"(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
