Search for: "C W Campbell"
Results 1 - 20
of 222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law, § 20.2(c) (3rd ed. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
Similarly, whether a use is new or distinct under Campbell is a nuanced inquiry b/c asking whether it’s competitive or not were always implicit in Campbell. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Traditional narratives about goodwill are flawed b/c they don’t go back before the 19th century. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Session 3: Federalism John C. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on November 7, 2023. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Jackson endeared himself to FDR by aggressively prosecuting—some would say abusively—Andrew W. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
Today, we are on the eve of the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’s entry into force. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Campbell was transformative as a parody. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Clarified and a regulation instead of a directive: That’s important b/c a directive is transposed into national law, w/27 potential different means. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 June 2023, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 June 2023, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, registration now open, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Lunney: points out that Campbell was just a remand. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
A: but the difficulty is knowing what disputes were resolved by settlement w/o a public record. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
” Chronicle of Higher Education (2020) & Phillip W. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
Campbell Soup Co., --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2022 WL 17835514, No. 21-cv-06002-JD (N.D. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
After all, he holds an advanced degree in statistics, and yet, he is willing write that that: “[w]hile historically used as a rule of thumb, statisticians have now concluded that using the 0.05 [p-value] threshold is more distortive than helpful. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
A lot has been written of late about the privacy (or otherwise) of family money cases, and all of it by men with big brains and a lot of words. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
C. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
So there’s a need to work w/the person for a better product/outcome in the long run. [read post]
