Search for: "C v. B"
Results 1 - 20
of 22,582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
& C. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v T; R v B; R v C; R v H [2009] EWCA Crim 1035; [2009] WLR (D) 19 “A criminal trial without a jury did not contravene a defendant's right to a fair trial where there was a real danger of jury tampering and proposed measures to prevent such interference did not sufficiently address [...] [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:38 am
Regina v B (F); Same v P (A); Same v C (J) [2010] EWCA Crim 1857; [2010] WLR (D) 21 “A judge sitting in the Crown Court had no power to quash an indictment simply because he did not believe that the proceedings were appropriately brought or were not in the public interest when compared with his assessment of the needs of other cases and that had not changed as a result of the introduction of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2010. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:47 am
“Alex Verdan QC and Charles Hale, both of 4 Paper Buildings, counsel for the father in A v B and C, consider the lessons that can be learned by practitioners from the Court of Appeal judgment.” Full story Family Law Week, 5th April 2012 Source: www.familylawweek.com [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:22 am
Sturgeon and others v Condor Flugdienst GmbH (Case C-402/07); Böck and another v Air France SA (Case C-432/07) [2009] WLR (D) 338 "Airline passengers whose flights were delayed by more than three hours were entitled to compensation. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am
From American Songwriter: Before we had Gwen Stefani teaching us how to spell “b-a-n-a-n-a-s” in “Hollaback Girl,” there was Tammy Wynette spelling out the pains of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:39 am
Real property — Foreclosure sale — Res judicata In 2011, Ronald B. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 2:06 pm
Katz, as substitute trustee, sold at a foreclosure sale properties owned by appellant, Douglas C. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:41 am
R v C [2009] UKHL 42; [2009] WLR (D) 272 “The words of s 30(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 ‘or for any other reason’ were wide enough to include an irrational fear preventing the free exercise of choice, and inability to communicate the choice made within s 30(2)(b) was not limited to physical inability. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
Brandon C. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:10 pm
Davis that the so-called “residual clause” of 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(3)(B) is void for vagueness. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:42 am
Congress had good reason to omit a good faith requirement from subsection (c)(2)(B). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:34 am
KRS 405.021(1)(b), (c), Subsections of Grandparent Visitation Statute, Not Unconstitutional – Published Opinion from Kentucky Court of Appeals Diana Skaggs Mon, 10/07/2019 - 13:34 Read more about KRS 405.021(1)(b), (c), Subsections of Grandparent Visitation Statute, Not Unconstitutional – Published Opinion from Kentucky Court of AppealsRobison, et al. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 7:50 am
And Infinity Steel Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:11 am
The post OXANA PARIKH, ET AL. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
In Harris et. al. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:14 pm
There is now a 3-3 circuit split on this question: Three Circuits have held that § 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutional in light of Dimaya. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
For the latter, Viceroy v Syrowatka will be used as an illustrative example. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
For the latter, Viceroy v Syrowatka will be used as an illustrative example. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:37 am
After a hearing, Trial Court dismissed Grandparents’ motion for grandparent visitation, determining that KRS 405.021(1)(b) and (c) were unconstitutional pursuant to Troxel v. [read post]
