Search for: "C v. B"
Results 81 - 100
of 22,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Feb. 24, 2012), the Seventh Circuit (Judge Posner) reversed an order denying class certification of Title VII race discrimination claims under Rules 23(b)(2) and (c)(4). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:17 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:02 am
This dates back to a case of Dodge v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:59 pm
C. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:59 pm
§ 154(b)(2)(C), which... [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:26 am
Case citation: Myeress v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:09 pm
Read this opinion -- or at least the first dozen pages or so -- and see whether you think the defendant:(A) Wouldn't have done the same thing but for his initial religious upbrining;(B) Wouldn't have done the same thing if he wouldn't have abandoned that upbringing;(C) A mix of both (A) and (B). [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 4:28 am
§ § 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C); and 21 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:06 pm
C 06-04538 WHA (N.D. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:50 am
Toki v Ipourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton (Case C-424/09); [2011] WLR (D) 128 “The mechanisms for the recognition of higher education diplomas pursuant to article 3(b) of Council Directive 89/48/EEC, as amended, were applicable where the profession at issue was a regulated professional activity within the meaning of the second sub-paragraph of article 1(d) of the Directive in the member state of origin, irrespective of whether the person concerned was or was… [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 12:30 am
We have hosted several posts detailing the judgment in A, B & C v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:38 am
Related PostsJuly 12, 2010 -- Calt on A, B & C v Ireland (1)December 9, 2009 -- A, B and C v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 6:22 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a Temporary Restraining Order, United States District Judge James Robart enjoined the federal government from enforcing sections 3(c), 5(a), 5(b), 5(c), and 5(e) of the Executive Order... [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
The statement focuses on Section 230(c)(1), even though the question presented to the court solely addressed Section 230(c)(2)(B). [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am
Avila v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:49 am
This is going to be brief b/c it's been quite a week here, but interesting things have been brewing.Supreme Court:* 924(c)---United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:49 am
§ 1513(b)(1), (c) and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:23 am
The arbitration agreement was substantively unconscionable because it was designed to benefit the seller in a number of ways: (a) it permitted an appeal only in case of an award of $0 or greater than $100,000; (b) it permitted an appeal if the award included injunctive relief; and (c) it allowed self-help remedies, including repossession. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 3:16 pm
USC (b) College Basketball: NYU v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:49 am
Complaint in Intervention Exhibit B to US Complaint in Intervention Exhibit C to US Complaint in Intervention [read post]
