Search for: "C-Call Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2011, 10:00 am
Zoning Board of Appeals of Edgartown (pdf), is consistent with Gale. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:03 am
" Lake County Board of Zoning Appeals, et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 11:16 pm
Corp v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
C. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
In terms of other interesting developments during the second quarter, two courts of appeal ground through three of highly detailed cases: California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Utah 2013), and contend on appeal, Appellee Br. 28, 54, 61. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
” Additional coverage of the oral argument in Janus comes from Bill Mears at Fox News and Daniel Vock at Governing, and C. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
The difficulty, of course, stems from the reality that though the entity (usually a corporation) is an autonomous legal person, it may act only through others, usually natural persons in positions of authority (board members or officers) with whom the attorney interacts. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
PG&E Corp. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Like the trial court, the court of appeal upheld the use of the exemption. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(Marteck Biosciences Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
App. 2005). 1 The City appealed the original jury verdict, and the case was heard by the Court of Appeals of Ohio inHilliard v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Complaint Allegations and Trial Court Ruling C. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am
” This argument appeals to pro-censorship enthusiasts on all sides of the political spectrum. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
