Search for: "C-Line, Inc. v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
For example, a contractor typically would treat the wages of employees providing services to a customer or working on a production line as direct costs because the contractor can track the amount of time the employee spends performing work for a particular contract.[4] Common categories of direct costs include material used for a particular contract (direct material), labor performed for a particular contract (direct labor), and other direct costs (ODCs, such as travel or special tooling… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
Fifth, there is a state action overlay when it comes to Big Tech censorship (see Missouri v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
First, it included a choice of law clause (cl 1): ‘[A]ny and all disputes between Carrier and any Guest shall be governed exclusively and in every respect by the general maritime law of the United States without regard to its choice of law principles … To the extent such maritime law is not applicable, the laws of the State of California (U.S.A.) shall govern the contract, as well as any other claims or disputes arising out of that relationship. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In the 2021 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
C. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
”[22] Bottom Line: The Sacklers still have $5 billion and escaped bankruptcy. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
") In Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 5:12 am
Sentelle of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
And will the antitrust agencies develop any bright-line rules, similar to merger presumptions, to evaluate these transactions? [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] United States of America v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Mersinger Regarding Enforcement Actions Against: 1) Opyn, Inc.; 2) Deridex, Inc.; and 3) ZeroEx, Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
