Search for: "C. (J.) VS. D. (S.)" Results 1 - 20 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The FDA’s actions led the drug companies voluntarily to withdraw PPA-containing products. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
  It is also clear thatthere will be fighting overvirtually every aspect of the court's reasoning and determinaiton. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
The parties agreed to not use the term “oligarch” in the proceedings.[29] From the 38 works Rybolovlev bought through Bouvier, 12 were arranged with assistance from Sotheby’s to Bouvier, and only four of those were at issue in trial.[30] These four include Leonardo da Vinci’s Salvador Mundi, Modigliani’s Tete, Klimt’s Wasserschlangen II, and Magritte’s Domaine d’Arnheim. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 6:55 am by Don Asher
Among federal safety regulations to protect against amputations are: 29 CFR Part 1910 Subparts O and P (machinery and machine guarding); 29 CFR 1926 Subpart I (hand tools and power tools); 29 CFR Part 1928 Subpart D; 29 CFR Part 1915 Subparts C, H, and J; and 29 CFR Part 1917 Subparts B, C, and G. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
In today’s rapidly evolving corporate landscape, the composition of boards is not just a matter of compliance or social responsibility; it’s a strategic imperative that shapes the future of firms. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:30 pm by Fabian Barth
In fact, it was only following the Court’s judgment in C-264/17 Mensing I that it became clear that the margin scheme applied by Mr Mensing would also cover acquisitions from other EU states. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal became the dominant political canon. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
I’d probably offer excerpts from all of the different opinions in that case to offer the students a comprehensive view of where things sit today. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:58 am by Marcel Pemsel
The defendant argued that the claimant’s trade mark lacked distinctiveness (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR) and is a customary term for the goods and services (Art. 7(1)(d) EUTMR). [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
This essay was originally published in Administrative & Regulatory Law News, the quarterly magazine of the American Bar Association’s Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Section. [read post]