Search for: "C. A. Matlock" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2008, 5:18 am
May 8, 2008) (Matlock previously applied to a vehicle in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
Oregon explains Randolph, Matlock, and Rodriguez in detail where the objector was removed from the scene. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 5:43 am
We decline to adopt the Ninth Circuit's reasoning and thus do not expand the holding of Randolph at the expense of Matlock. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 1:30 pm
Here, the co-occupant defendant was not absent, as was the defendant in Matlock. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 7:09 am
As we have said, Randolph expressly reaffirmed the holdings of Matlock and Rodriguez, noting that “it would needlessly limit the capacity of the police to respond to ostensibly legitimate opportunities in the field if we were to hold that reasonableness required the police to take affirmative steps to find a potentially objecting co-tenant before acting on the permission they had already received. [read post]