Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
The patent, granted in 2011, had been opposed on the grounds of Article 100(c), 100(b) and 100(a) EPC for lack of novelty and inventive step.In the appealed decision, the opposition division had held that the process claimed in auxiliary request 10 did not add subject-matter and that it was novel. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:43 am
The subject-matter of claim 1 lacked novelty in view of D1. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
Huw G. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:02 pm
This post has been written by Eva De Götzen. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The same documents D20 and D21 as used in the opposition proceedings concerning the patent in suit were invoked against the subject-matter of the application in suit. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
§ 541(c)(2). [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
C. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
Articles of incorporation typically identify: (a) The organization’s name; (b) Purpose or purposes of the nonprofit; (c) Agent for service of process — that is, a person whose name and address are identified and who can receive lawsuits and other official correspondence and other matters; and (d) Any limitations on corporate powers. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Decision G 1/05 [3.6] states: “Thus in opposition proceedings under A 100(c) it is a ground of revocation that the subject-matter of the European patent granted on a divisional application extends beyond the content of the earlier application as filed. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
Tax Matters. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:28 am
c. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 11:44 am
Haftel & Stephanie C. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 2:07 am
., ECJ, 12.09.2018, Case C-304/17 (Löber); ECJ, 16.06.2016, Case C-12/15 (Universal); ECJ, 28.01.2015, Case C-375/13 (Kolassa)). [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 1:06 pm
, In re PSE&G Shareholder Litigation, 726 A.2d 994, 997 (N.J. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:58 am
L. c. 272, § 31, does not encompass electronically transmitted text, or "online conversations," for the purposes of a prosecution for attempted dissemination of matter harmful to a minor under G. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
Decisions G 1/05 and G 1/06 were made in the context of divisional applications. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:54 am
” The single justice reported the matter to the full SJC. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Based on decision T 384/91 in connection with decision G 1/93, and on decision G 9/91, it reasoned as follows: In decision G 1/93, the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) had defined the conditions under which a patent could be maintained unamended despite it containing subject matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed. [read post]
