Search for: "C. I. E." Results 21 - 40 of 16,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2014, 1:58 pm
I-9 and E-Verify compliance enthusiasts report a noteworthy trend in recent cases brought to the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC). [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:01 am by Admin
Mark the answers as (a) if only assumption I is implicit (b) if only assumption II is implicit (c ) if either I or II is implicit (d) if neither I nor II is implicit (e ) If both I and II are implicit 1. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 2:12 pm
Osservatorio Sophie Domaine, Problemi e prospettive dell’idea di un Patto globale per l’ambiente Ilaria Infante, Pesca sostenibile, Unione europea e Marocco: la sentenza della Corte di giustizia e le conseguenze per il popolo ‘Saharawi’ e la sua autodeterminazione Diego Mauri, Presunzione di innocenza e rimedio effettivo: osservazioni brevi (ma di ampio respiro) a margine dei casi Maslarova e Lolov Ludovica Poli, Il primo… [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:20 am
  I'm looking forward to a fun month. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:19 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
It says something along the lines of: "Students A, B, and C need to take your exam early and/or Students D, E, and F need to take your exam late. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 7:43 am
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH NETWORK I M M I G R A T I O N, R E F U G E E C I T I Z E N S H I P L A W A B S T... [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:08 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Yesterday, I got an interesting e-mail from a student asking me whether a speed limit sign constitutes hearsay. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 1:33 am
; and (2)  What methods can I use to limit the cost of E-Discovery while still maintaining a defensible preservation? [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 1:33 am
; and (2)  What methods can I use to limit the cost of E-Discovery while still maintaining a defensible preservation? [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 4:21 am by Krzysztof Pacula
AG Saugmandsgaard Øe observes in his Opinion presented today in the case HRVATSKE ŠUME, C-242/20, the Court of Justice has already faced requests for a preliminary ruling where arose a question on qualification of an action for unjust enrichment for the purposes of the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]