Search for: "C. Smith"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,759
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Along with other accounting manipulation, this contributed to the situation in the UK described by leading analyst Terry Smith: “…much of the apparent growth in profits which had occurred in the 1980s was the result of accounting sleight of hand rather than genuine economic growth…[2]. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
[The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to have committed the assault, but Judge Wilkinson's concurrence argues that, absent this unusual factor, one-sided pseudonymity should be frowned on.] [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
Smith has explained, under District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:04 pm
Officials at the William C. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
“Clients hire an attorney for the attorney’s knowledge, experience, and ability to interpret and apply legal precedent,” said Joel Murray , an attorney with McKean Smith in Portland, Oregon. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
David Smith dispute: masculine abstract expressionist, Cubi XII, April 7, 1963. 109 5/8 by 49 ¼ by 32 ¼ inches; Lauren Clay, No side to fall into, 2012 paper and acrylic, 18 ½ by 7 by 3 inches—triggered a C&D. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Alex Laar (Oxford), ‘Sir Thomas Smith’s Legal Annotations’ (with rare books viewing). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
The two did not have their relationship in writing, although it was presumed to be an agent style relationship.[22] During the trial, Sazanov stated that they did have a written agreement which mentioned the commission Bouvier would receive for his work as an agent to Rybolovlev.[23] Rybolovlev filed legal claims against Bouvier in Singapore, Hong Kong, New York, Geneva, and his primary residence of Monaco.[24] In December of 2023, Rybolovlev and Bouvier reached a confidential settlement; ending… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
Posted by Kris Pederson, Barton Edgerton, and Jamie Smith (EY), on Thursday, February 15, 2024 Editor's Note: Kris Pederson is Center for Board Matters Leader, Barton Edgerton is Center for Board Matters Corporate Governance Research Leader, and Jamie Smith is Center for Board Matters Investor Outreach and Corporate Governance Director at EY Americas. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
Posted by Kris Pederson, Barton Edgerton, and Jamie Smith (EY), on Thursday, February 15, 2024 Editor's Note: Kris Pederson is Center for Board Matters Leader, Barton Edgerton is Center for Board Matters Corporate Governance Research Leader, and Jamie Smith is Center for Board Matters Investor Outreach and Corporate Governance Director at EY Americas. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm
A contextual example of Appellant's reliance on fictitious authority includes: For instance, in Smith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:20 am
Mason Smith, Ombuds, University of the BahamasJulie A. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:27 pm
" 28 CFR § 600.8(c). [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
(Blackman was at the Heritage Foundation on Wednesday for a panel and on C-SPAN early this morning.) [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
