Search for: "C. v. A."
Results 1 - 20
of 61,950
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:10 am
In Alsyrawan v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:03 pm
The full media release can be accessed here. 3 The Federal Court finds that a term in Auto & General Insurance Company’s contracts is not unfair On 22 March 2024, the Federal Court in ASIC v Auto & General Insurance Company limited [2024] FCA 272 handed down the first decision to apply the unfair contract terms (UCT) regime in the context of insurance since its expansion to insurance policies on 5… [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:49 pm
"] From Doe v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:37 pm
And in Micula v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:38 am
See Sheetz of Del., Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am
C. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 2:55 am
c. [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:25 am
: on R (TTT) v Michaela Community Schools Trust [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin). [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
CFPB v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:31 am
Susan V. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), concluding that (1) it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Doherty’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief since they were moot, and (2) Doherty failed to state a claim for damages because emotional distress damages are not available under Title II of the ADA after the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummings v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), concluding that (1) it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Doherty’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief since they were moot, and (2) Doherty failed to state a claim for damages because emotional distress damages are not available under Title II of the ADA after the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummings v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:00 am
C. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil Procedural Law, University of Bonn. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
In its judgment in C-173/23 Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU ECLI:EU:C:2024:295 (Judgment), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on some aspects of the duty of national courts to assess of their own motion the unfairness of contractual terms in the context of air carriage under the 1999 Montreal Convention on the liability of the international air carrier (MC99). [read post]
