Search for: "C. v. A."
Results 21 - 40
of 61,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 2:25 am
Regina (GC) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Regina (C) v Same [2010] WLR (D) 193 “When it was not possible to reconcile a decision of the House of Lords in relation to the proportionality and legitimacy of the indefinite retention on the United Kingdom’s Police National Computer of biometric data obtained in the course of criminal investigations with a subsequent holding by the European Court of Human Rights that the policy was unlawful, the… [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:01 am
Regina v H (J); Same v Ferris; Same v W (A); Same v Walker; Same v Dan; Same v S (C); Same v Robertson; Same v P (M) [2011] EWCA Crim 2753; [2012] WLR (D) 12 “In principle, in historic or cold cases, a defendant had to be sentenced in accordance with the sentencing regime applicable at the date of sentence. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
You may recall that in the summer of 2005 in another Commission v Council case, C- [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:30 pm
C. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:11 am
DISMISSED – Solicitation of Burglary, State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:09 pm
WORSHAM v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
C. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 8:45 am
Cases C-466/19 P Qualcomm and C-481/19 P DB v Consob Marc Veenbrink Judgment of 28 January 2021, Qualcomm v Commission, C-466/19P, EU:C:2021:76, and Judgment of 2 February 2021, DB v Commissione Nazionale per le... [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:26 pm
C. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:45 pm
COCKBURN v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 7:12 am
MANOOGIAN v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:34 am
JOHNSON v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:26 am
Regina v I (C) and others; [2009] WLR (D) 286 “A judge who had conducted the case management of a long or complex case, whether or not as a preparatory hearing, had to conduct the trial in that case unless there were sufficiently compelling cause to depart from that rule. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:26 am
C v D and another [2010] EWHC 2940 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 292 “A time-limited offer was not capable of being an offer within the meaning of CPR Pt 36, which established that an offer must be capable of acceptance unless and until withdrawn by service of a notice within CPR r 36.9(2). [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:33 pm
Today’s judgment in Joined Cases C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P and C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited (“GSK”) v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 5:55 am
Worsham (“Worsham”), appellant, filed a complaint against Raymond C. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:31 am
Yes, answers the Court of Justice in its Grand Chamber formation in its judgments in Case C-531/06 Commission v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:02 pm
A while ago we noted the Court of Justice's judgment in Joined Cases C-120/06 P and C-121/06 P FIAMM and FIAMM Technologies v Council and Commission. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:47 am
DORA C. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:57 am
Interflora Inc and another v Marks & Spencer plc (Case C-323/09); [2011] WLR (D) 281 “Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC and article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark was to be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark was entitled to prevent a competitor from advertising on the basis of a keyword which was identical with the trade mark and which had been selected in an internet referencing service… [read post]
