Search for: "C. v. A."
Results 41 - 60
of 61,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2011, 8:07 am
v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:06 am
McE v Prison Service of Northern Ireland and Another; C and A v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland; M v Same House of Lords “Covert surveillance of communications between lawyers and their clients, covered by legal professional privilege, was permitted under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, notwithstanding any statutory rights of [...] [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:04 am
Regina v C(S) [2012] EWCA Crim 6; [2012] WLR (D) 5 “At a retrial of a conspirator about whom the jury at the first trial had been unable to reach a verdict, the Crown would be entitled to tell the jury that it was the prosecution’s case that those who had been acquitted at the first trial were probably involved in the conspiracy and that the jury would be entitled to take into account the acquitted conspirators’ probable role in the importation when deciding… [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 5:40 am
Today: The latest tape in the series, focusing on Mapp v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:23 am
Realchemie Nederland BV v Bayer CropScience AG (Case C-406/09); [2011] WLR (D) 350 “Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p1) applied to the recognition and enforcement of a decision of a court or tribunal that contained an order to pay a fine in order to ensure compliance with a judgment given in a civil and commercial matter. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
WORSHAM v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:26 am
WORSHAM v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:27 am
C plc and another v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:04 am
WORSHAM v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of… [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
Judgment in Case C-607/18P—NKT v Commission: Procedural Rights … and Wrongs in Cartel Proceedings Jacob Borum The Court of Justice of the EU, set aside part of the judgment of the General Court, based on inconsistency between the statement of... [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
Helmut Brokelmann and Mariarosaria Ganino ask C-449/14 P DTS v Commission: When is a Tax Measure State Aid? [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:47 am
“Alex Verdan QC and Charles Hale, both of 4 Paper Buildings, counsel for the father in A v B and C, consider the lessons that can be learned by practitioners from the Court of Appeal judgment.” Full story Family Law Week, 5th April 2012 Source: www.familylawweek.com [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:03 am
Regina( C) v Secretary of State for Justice; [2008] WLR (D) 262 “The introduction of an amendment to the Secure Training Centre Rules to permit physical restraint of young offenders in secure training centres to ensure good order and discipline without prior consultation with the Children's Commissioner was unlawful and engaged art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:34 am
Regina (C) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “Secondary legislation laid before Parliament three weeks after a report sent by the Youth Justice Board to the directors of privatised secure training centres holding children, following two deaths in custody, was quashed as procedurally flawed and in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:51 am
Civil search order discloses potential criminal liability C plc and Another v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:23 am
Freeport plc v Arnoldsson (Case C-98/06) “The fact that claims brought against a number of defendants had different legal bases did not preclude application of the provision in art 6(1) of Regulation 44/2001 (the successor to the Brussels Convention of 1968) that in certain circumstances multiple defendants could be sued in the courts of the domicile of any of them. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:08 am
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Co Ltd and others; Nokia Corpn v Revenue and Customs Comrs (Internationak Trademark Association intervening) (Joined Cases C-446/09 and C-495/09); [2011] WLR (D) 349 “Goods coming from a non-EU state which were imitations of goods protected in the European Union by a trade mark or copies of goods protected in the EU by copyright could not be classified as “counterfeit goods” within… [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:04 am
The post KASSONDRA TOPPER v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:11 am
The post OXANA PARIKH, ET AL. v. [read post]
