Search for: "C. v. A."
Results 81 - 100
of 61,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 8:07 pm
C. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:47 am
Folien Fischer AG and another v Ritrama SpA (Case C-133/11); [2012] WLR (D) 292 “An action for a negative declaration seeking to establish the absence of liability in tort, delict, or quasi-delict fell within the scope of article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L12, p 1).” WLR Daily, 25th October 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 5:56 am
The post IRIS MCCLAIN v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:46 am
Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) v JP Morgan Chase Bank NA (Case C-144/10); [2011] WLR (D) 188 “The exclusive jurisdiction, conferred by article 22(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, on the courts of the member state in which a company had its seat, was confined to proceedings whose principal subject matter comprised the validity of the constitution, the nullity or the dissolution of the company, or the validity of the decisions of its organs.… [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:00 am
Capital C Infringement of Capitol Records EMI April Music Inc. v. 4MM Games, LLC, 2014 WL 1383468 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Memorandum Opinion […] [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:49 am
Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Broadcast Music Inc. et al v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:34 am
Kücük v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen Case C-586/10; [2012] WLR (D) 11 “Clause 5(1)(a) of the framework agreement on fixed-term work, in the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, meant that a temporary need for replacement staff, provided for by national legislation could, in principle, constitute an objective reason under that clause for the renewal of… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 8:45 am
Philipp Studt asks Case C-615/15 P Samsung SDI v Commission: The Concept of ‘Single and Continuous Infringement’ and Cartels. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:44 pm
WALLACE C. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:03 am
However, donations to a 501(c)(6) are not tax deductible as charitable contributions, as is the case with a 501(c)(3). [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:40 pm
They follow on from Case C-70/06 Commission v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:54 am
eDate Advertising GmbH v X: Martinez and another v MGN Ltd; (Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10); [2011] WLR (D) 330 “Under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 a person who considered that his privacy rights had been infringed by content placed online on an internet website had the option of bringing an action either before the courts of the member state in which the publisher of that content was… [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:27 am
Regina (Horvath) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Case C-428/07 Court of Justice of the European Communities “EC member states were entitled to make direct payments to farmers in the context of the Community Common Agricultural Policy subject to the farmers' not obstructing public rights of way over their land, if certain conditions were [...] [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:04 am
Regina (C) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Liberty and another intervening); Regina (J) Same [2012] EWHC 1681 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 182 “The statutory discretion for the police to retain custody photographs obtained from criminal suspects who were subsequently not proceeded against or acquitted did not extend to the retention of photographs taken from all suspects for a substantial and potentially indefinite period, in breach of their right to privacy.”… [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:07 am
F & C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd and others v Barthelemy and another (No 3) [2012] EWCA Civ 843; [2012] WLR (D) 183 “Where an offer to settle proceedings had been made which was neither in substance nor in form compliant with Part 36, it was wrong in principle to take as directly analogous, and as applicable, the potential costs consequences had it been a Part 36 offer.” WLR Daily, 22nd June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm
Now, the Court of Justice has addressed the issue in Joined Cases C-120/06 P and C-121/06 P FIAMM and FIAMM Technologies v Council and Commission. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:22 pm
C. in order to obtain blood. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:24 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Crime witness question Charles C. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:29 am
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — First-degree assault After a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, George C. [read post]
