Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. NEVADA." Results 121 - 140 of 1,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 4:11 pm by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 3:30 am by Angela Fernandez
The story begins in the mid-1960s with a decision by the Forest Service to allow the Disney Company to develop a ski resort in the Mineral King area of California’s Sierra Nevada mountains. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:35 am by Adam Chandler
Commentators continue to analyze Monday’s opinions, particularly Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:01 pm
Sherman's guilt.Since it's Nevada, there's a slightly greater chance than in California that Mr. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm by Marty Lederman
By my count, forty-two “topside” amicus briefs have been filed in the California Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:47 am by Paul M. Hauge
Scarce resources needed to be redirected from nonessential operations to essential ones, and gold mines, such as the Lava Cap mine in Nevada County, California, were deemed nonessential. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:47 am by Paul M. Hauge
Scarce resources needed to be redirected from nonessential operations to essential ones, and gold mines, such as the Lava Cap mine in Nevada County, California, were deemed nonessential. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:47 am by Paul M. Hauge
Scarce resources needed to be redirected from nonessential operations to essential ones, and gold mines, such as the Lava Cap mine in Nevada County, California, were deemed nonessential. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:15 am
   For California and Nevada corporations, the question of who may call a meeting of the board is answered in statute, unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation or bylaws. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
HBSC Bank Nevada, N.A., 557 F.3d 1026 (2009), will probably be impacted as well. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
As you might expect, there has been a lot of press coverage of yesterday's argument in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]