Search for: "CALIFORNIANS FOR DISABILITY RIGHTS" Results 81 - 100 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2011, 4:48 pm by Lisa Perrochet
  That is routine (as evidenced by the many Prop 64 cases that were handed down while Californians for Disability Rights v Meryvn’s was pending). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:10 pm by Edward Smith
My staff and I have been protecting the rights of injured Californians for more than 30 years. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:17 am
The Court ruled that a government may specify what mode of carrying to allow (open or concealed), but a government may not make it impossible for the vast majority of Californians to exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:33 am by David DePaolo
As the token Californian on the Blogger's Panel at the National Workers' Compensation and Disability Conference in Las Vegas yesterday, I drew fire from moderator Mark Walls, and a bit of derision from my fellow panelists. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:02 pm by Thomas Nantais
Workers in Californian firms who suffer injuries or illnesses while performing their job duties are entitled to enjoy multiple benefits such as healthcare, disability compensation, and lost wages along with other financial and mental damages that occurred as an outcome of the workplace incident. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 4:15 pm
Moreover, the Supreme Court has gutted the Americans With Disabilities Act by interpreting the statute to exclude protection for individuals who have a disability that medical treatment can control or diminish. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
During his tenure, Bet Tzedek provided free legal representation to more than 50,000 primarily aging or disabled clients on nursing home patients' rights, elder abuse, Holocaust restitution, slum housing conditions, access to medical care, consumer fraud and other critical issues. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 3:36 am by Jon L. Gelman
Bottom line: Californians have a right to know about potential exposures to the coronavirus to protect themselves, their families, and their communities. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
" However, since 1992, Congress "has prohibited the use of funds to act on such applications, disabling the program. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:12 am by David J. DePaolo
" The report does not indicate how permanent disability indemnity is increased by $700M, a claim that has been promoted by Baker and others since the rumored reform was announced. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 1:10 pm by McNicholas & McNicholas LLP
You have rights as an employee, even during a pandemic Although we have seen the way we live and do business undergo rapid changes during the past year, the COVID-19 pandemic should not affect your rights as an employee. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm by Jan von Hein
German Federal Constitutional Court 19.02.2013, Case 1 BvL 1/11 and 1 BvR 3247/09, paras 44, 73 = FamRZ 2013, 521, 523, 526], and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights on Art. 8(1) ECHR concerning the child’s right to respect for his or her private life: The European Court of Human Rights had ruled that the latter encompassed the right of the child to establish a legal parent-child-relationship which was regarded as part of the child’s… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am by Lyle Denniston
The Justices will take on a significant new test of the right to sue for parents of a disabled child who needs assistance while attending schools that receive federal funds. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:08 am by Rob
“This historic administrative victory underscores the Department’s commitment to vindicating the rights of Californians victimized by workplace discrimination,” said DFEH Director Phyllis Cheng. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:02 pm
This most recent one with MetLife will likely see $40 million going to about 30,000 Californians, according to Mr. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 3:21 am
" Californian Can Be Sued in N.J. for Alleged Libel on Internet   " A state appeals court ruled Thursday that a California resident accused of making libelous statements in a Web-based forum can be sued in New Jersey because the material was 'targeted' toward a New Jersey audience. [read post]