Search for: "CALIFORNIANS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 21 - 40
of 588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 7:55 am
That’s what’s at stake in a case called Patz v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
In Beebe v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am
[The California Pork case (NPCC v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:47 pm
In Gentry v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 7:33 am
–Kuklinski v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm
(Brack v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:37 am
CalOPPA requires certain commercial operators of online services, including websites and mobile and social apps, which collect personally identifiable information from Californians to conspicuously post a privacy policy. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:50 am
Carney of the Central District of California issued a preliminary injunction in Boland v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In City of Richmond v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 2:32 pm
But in TransUnion v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:05 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:12 pm
In National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:50 pm
The epicenters of California’s franchise earthquakes include the FAST Act and AB-5, the law that codified the ABC employment definition articulated in the Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:34 pm
Recent cases such as League to Save Lake Tahoe Mountain Area Preservation Foundation v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:58 pm
Related Cases: Maryland v. [read post]
