Search for: "CAMDEN COUNTY COUNCIL"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
An email sent to a county election official trying to phish logins to its voter database. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
California – Orange County’s Wild West of Campaign Finance: The Board of Education Voice of OC – Noah Biesiada | Published: 2/28/2024 Almost every campaign for city, county and state government in Orange County has a limit on how much donors can give to their favorite candidates. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:47 am
After receiving her J.D. with high honors from Rutgers University School of Law Camden, Professor Family completed clerkships with the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:47 am
After receiving her J.D. with high honors from Rutgers University School of Law Camden, Professor Family completed clerkships with the U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am
” “If further reasons were necessary, NowMedical are not experts (unlike Dr Camden-Smith). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 12:07 am
Camden London borough Camden has a helpline that will direct callers to various services and funding that may be available to them, which can be found here. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 12:07 am
Camden London borough Camden has a helpline that will direct callers to various services and funding that may be available to them, which can be found here. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:22 pm
LB Camden v 1) Simple Properties Management Ltd 2) Mr MIguel Cabeo Cespedes LON/00BA/HBA/2020/0011 (not on Bailii yet. [read post]
17 May 2021, 6:00 am
Limmer is a New York criminal attorney practicing primarily in Nassau, Suffolk, and Queens counties. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:09 pm
Gil v London Borough of Camden (2020) EWHC 735 (QB) This was an application for permission to appeal the dismissal of a s.204 appeal for being out of time. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:26 pm
Damages should be assessed as per Wallace v Manchester City Council. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
(Pix Credit U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Beyer was the speaker at the January meeting of the Siouxland Estate Planning Council in Sioux City, Iowa. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
The local authority must consider whether to exercise its discretion and do so in accordance with the criteria set out in R v Camden LBC exp. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
Other areas need further review as well.These will be studied and reported on in the coming months.The Commission held its organizational meeting in Trenton on June 18, 2007, and subsequentpublic business meetings on July 18, 2007, August 15, 2007, November 14, 2007, December 19,2007 and January 16, 2008.In order to maximize the opportunity for public participation in the Commission’s evaluationprocess, the body held three nighttime public hearings, on September 26, 2007 in NewBrunswick,… [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:30 pm
To address this issue, then-Attorney General Holder launched the Federal Interagency Reentry Council in 2011. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am
” The Court reminded itself of the high threshold for a mandatory, rather than prohibitory injunction, of a ‘strong prima facie case’, via Francis V Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2003] 1 WLR 2248, then went on to the criteria for the exercise of the discretion to accommodate pending appeal in R v Camden London Borough Council ex parte Mohammed [1997] 30 HLR 315. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
Mr Hotak unsuccessfully appealed this determination to the County Court and then to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:06 pm
Taking a s.204 appeal decision to the Court of Appeal will require a judicial review alongside it to challenge a refusal to accommodate pending second appeal by the Council, assuming that there is a viable challenge on failure to apply R (Mohammed) v LB Camden [1998] 30 HLR 315 principles.The exception is where what is being challenged is the County Court’s refusal to order temporary accommodation pending s.204 Appeal on a s.204A application, and that is probably an… [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:06 pm
Taking a s.204 appeal decision to the Court of Appeal will require a judicial review alongside it to challenge a refusal to accommodate pending second appeal by the Council, assuming that there is a viable challenge on failure to apply R (Mohammed) v LB Camden [1998] 30 HLR 315 principles.The exception is where what is being challenged is the County Court’s refusal to order temporary accommodation pending s.204 Appeal on a s.204A application, and that is probably an… [read post]
