Search for: "CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 1 - 20
of 315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
It proposes to dismantle or radically overhaul the Departments of Justice and State; eliminate the Departments of Homeland Security, Education, and Commerce; radically repurpose other agencies; and eviscerate the professional civil service. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
He saw a United States in turmoil after the January 6th Capitol attack, under former President Donald Trump. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
Department of State’s Office of Global Criminal Justice: It will take time to fully digest this morning’s order. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:15 am
Here we take a step back to examine the legal claims made by South Africa in its application, the basis for South Africa’s claim for standing to bring the case, what to expect as the case unfolds, and the possible broader legal effects of the case, including for the United States and other allies of Israel. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
In 2017, former President Donald Trump directed his White House Counsel Don McGahn to pressure then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to avoid recusing himself from overseeing the Department of Justice’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am
The second question before the court centers on the legality of the plan itself. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
Bruen, in which the court struck down New York’s handgun-licensing scheme, the justices will hear argument in another major gun-rights case: United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
When appointing Hur to lead the probe, Attorney General Merrick Garland cited the “extraordinary circumstances” of the Justice Department investigating the president as he considered a reelection bid. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
Victims of trucking accidents may be entitled to substantial compensation for funeral expenses, medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more.Big Rig Accidents in the United StatesIn the United States, trucking accidents are notoriously dangerous. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
Victims of trucking accidents may be entitled to substantial compensation for funeral expenses, medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more.Big Rig Accidents in the United StatesIn the United States, trucking accidents are notoriously dangerous. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(My former State Department colleague Todd Buchwald previously discussed some of the legal issues implicated by the Tanker Wars in this Just Security piece.) [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
Co-Conspirator 4, a Justice Department official who worked on civil matters and who, with the Defendant, attempted to use the Justice Department to open sham election crime investigations and influence state legislatures with knowingly false claims of election fraud. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
See United States v. [read post]
