Search for: "CAPE, PLC" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:34 am by Anthony Fairclough
Cape Intermediate Ltd v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK), heard 18-19 Feb 2019. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 5:20 am
, Chandler v Cape plc [2012] EWCA Civ 525.Tort, however, can be understood in two senses here. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:52 pm
I am delighted to set out below some thoughts on a recently published book on corporate social responsibility (CSR). [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:20 am by Matthias Weller
Similar case against other UK parents are Lungowe & Ors v Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor, [2016] EWHC 975 (TCC), 27 May 2016, appeal dismissed 13 October 2017, [2017] EWCA Civ 1528, and AAA & Ors v Unilever Plc & Anor, [2017] EWHC 371 (QB), 27 February 2017. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:22 am by Giesela Ruehl
He then relied on several well-known English cases to derive basic principles for the imposition of such duty of care on the parent company: (1) The three-part test of foreseeability, proximity and reasonableness set out in Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman constitutes a starting point of the analysis; 2) A duty of care may be owed, in appropriate circumstances, to the employees of the parent company and those directly affected by the subsidiary’s operations; 3) Such a duty of care… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 3:25 am by Xandra Kramer
Mr Justice Fraser stated that separate legal personality of the constituent entities of corporate group represents a fundamental principle of English law (at [92]) and claimants failed to provide evidence of high degree of control and direction by RDS sufficient to meet the three-fold test on the existence of duty of care set by Caparo Industries plc v Dickman and clarified by Chandler v Cape. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Cape Industries Plc., [1990] Ch. 433 (C.A.) [read post]