Search for: "CARRIE A SMITH V MARK S SMITH"
Results 1 - 20
of 318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
SMITH AND BRUCE M. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 6:20 pm
Smith, Oxford University Department of Pharmacology; The King's College, and Dan M. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 6:20 pm
Smith, Oxford University Department of Pharmacology; The King's College, and Dan M. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:42 pm
Moreover, Judge Kendall decided that the use of Houlihan’s mark to identify it as the subject of the posters’ criticism was protected by Justice Holmes’ opinion in Prestonettes v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:07 am
Smith did not carry his burden of proof. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
At first instance,covered by the IPKat here, Peter Smith J (English judges usually only get a surname – unless there is another judge around with the same one, like, in this case, Sir Andrew Smith) dismissed almost all of Mattel’s claims: there was no infringement of Mattel's two SCRABBLE marks (and no passing off) by the use of SCRAMBLE or SCRAMBLE WITH FRIENDS. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:32 am
Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 4:30 am
" Hasbro, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm
(And another in Smith v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
It is a restoration of the high-water mark of free exercise accommodation, established by the cases of Sherbert v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
Smith, 510 F.3d 641, 647 (6th Cir. 2007) (citation omitted). [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:02 pm
Based on Trooper Smith's training and experience, such uncertain driving patterns immediately after passing signs indicating a drug check, and the driver's nervous reaction upon seeing a marked patrol car, were sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion for a short investigatory detention. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
By Noah Marks Part 2 in a 2-part series Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued an opinion covering both Riley v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:14 am
Smith's own testimony):In explaining the selection of opposer's mark, Ms. [read post]
19 May 2019, 1:05 pm
This is so because finding a mark to be generic carries significant consequence, as it forecloses an applicant from any rights over the mark--once a mark is determined to be generic, it can never receive trademark protection. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:48 am
Cir. 1987); Alcatraz Media, Inc. v. [read post]
