Search for: "CASE V. HATCH"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,020
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2013, 9:33 pm
By Andrew Williams -- Saying "But I won't do it" is not sufficient to avoid infringement in a Hatch-Waxman litigation, according to the Federal Circuit in the recently decided Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:56 pm
Actavis (previously FTC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:31 pm
The case arose over Celgene's multiple-myeloma drug pomalidomide (Pomalyst). [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:31 pm
The case arose over Celgene's multiple-myeloma drug pomalidomide (Pomalyst). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:18 pm
§ 271(e)(1) was the occasion for the Federal Circuit to illustrate the continued debate over the scope of the safe harbor enacted as part of the Hatch-Waxman Act in Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- Earlier this month, the Federal Circuit affirmed a District Court judgment of obviousness in ANDA litigation under the Hatch Waxman Act having a long provenance of earlier litigation, in Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:14 am
On January 14, 2020, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Kelly v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
In FTC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 6:07 pm
Reporter Kendall Hatch has a piece in The Metrowest Daily News considering the long-term implications of the Supreme Judicial Court's recent ruling in the open meeting law case, District Attorney for the Northern District v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Hatch-Waxman junkies will surely be watching this case closely. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:22 pm
Bartlett, a case testing whether the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (and in particular the Hatch-Waxman Act) preempts a state design-defect claim against a generic drug... [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:59 am
Hatch v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:55 am
Mensing (09-993) and Actavis Elizabeth, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:47 am
” The second reason the Court should hear the case is to ensure the viability of the important antitrust case of Verizon v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:29 pm
Akorn, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:26 am
Case citation: Bock & Hatch LLC v. [read post]
