Search for: "CASTILLO v. US "
Results 61 - 80
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2009, 11:18 am
" Castillo asked in his television program yesterday Sunday. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:59 am
Judge Holderman declined to follow the lead of Chief Judge Castillo in Montel Aetnastak, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 7:10 am
U.S. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
In so holding, the Court avoided questions of the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentencing factors and instead relied on its statutory analysis in Castillo v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 12:25 pm
The sun may be disappearing (temporarily, anyway). [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:26 pm
Today in a thoughtful separate opinion concurring in the denial of en banc review in US v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 11:11 am
In 1999, the Supreme Court ruled in Olmstead v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:29 pm
State, supra.And that brings us to the issue this post examines. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:48 am
Provident Capital Indemnity, et al, 11-cr-0014 (E.D.Va.) can be found here.The complaint in the civil action, SEC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
See Rawl v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:38 am
Muñoz and Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 2:15 pm
The class action, filed in 2012 (Sidney Reid, et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 7:15 am
A 1970, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 5:01 am
When it is time to do the problems, I show the students how the depreciation deductions for each year during the recovery period add up to the original cost, so that they can see how the cost is “spread” over the period and so that they have a method to check their use of the MACRS table to make certain they have done the computation properly.Thus, when I read the opinion in Castillo v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:39 pm
Implications Judge Castillo’s decision stands in stark contrast to the Eight Circuit’s recent decision in EEOC v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:53 pm
Castillo, 2016 U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 11:35 pm
The post More on Castillo And The 100:1 Crack/Powder Ratio thoughtfully details that, after the Second Circuit's reversal of Judge Robert Sweet's below-guideline sentence based on the conclusion that he "unilaterally the 100:1 ratio on policy grounds" in US v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
Having interpreted the pre-1998 version of this provision in Castillo v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 6:20 am
In Castillo v. [read post]
