Search for: "CATES v. CATES"
Results 41 - 60
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 8:08 am
See, e.g., Troxel v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 6:19 am
Precision Drone LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:45 am
A 2000, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Keck, Mahin & Cate v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
Cates to describe it as terrifying. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:45 pm
Cates, 154 N.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:34 am
Klinger v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 10:47 am
People with connections to the Conservative Party continue to run Ethical Oil. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:16 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:57 am
Cate, (9th Cir., June 16, 2014), the 9th Circuit reversed the dismissal of a Shetaut Neter inmate's RLUIPA claim for a Kemetic diet, holding that the government had not adequately shown there was not a less restrictive alternative to denying plaintiff's food request.In Ali v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:36 am
Cate, 2014 U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
The issue is whether SLUSA preempts a class action in which the plaintiff-victims allege “(1) that they “purchase[d]” uncovered securities (certificates of deposit that [we]re not traded on any national exchange), but (2) that the defendants falsely told the victims that the uncovered securities were backed by covered securities. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
The issue is whether SLUSA preempts a class action in which the plaintiff-victims allege “(1) that they “purchase[d]” uncovered securities (certificates of deposit that [we]re not traded on any national exchange), but (2) that the defendants falsely told the victims that the uncovered securities were backed by covered securities. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Cate, 2014 U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 10:47 am
Badgley, P.C. cite six Illinois Appellate Court decisions (including Settlement Funding v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:22 pm
The types of mistakes that can be corrected include: (1) mistakes made through the fault of the PTO, (2) mistakes of a clerical or typographical nature, or of minor character, that are not the fault of the PTO, and (3) mistakes in naming or not naming an inventor. [32] Mistakes that fall outside of these cate- gories, and that do not afford legal grounds for reissue or for reexamination, will not be corrected after the date of the patent.[33] Given these restrictions, it is not clear… [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:06 am
Cate, 2014 U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Oral arguments in Hatim v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 8:43 am
Drichas v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 3:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm
Mattew Cate. [read post]
