Search for: "CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY" Results 1 - 20 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 1:11 pm by Lexi Coghe
Bunnatine “Bunny” Greenhouse put her career on the line to stand up to corruption in the United States Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 4:17 am by D. Daniel Sokol
First, the focus is on state failure that is either caused by or is in some way related to armed conflict within a state, either from a civil war or from armed intervention by intervening states, United Nations Security Council action, or otherwise. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:59 am by Melanie Fontes
By Jeremy Pilaar* Earlier this month, Uber and Lyft drivers across the United States and the world went on strike. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Gary Corn
Army banned the use of Chinese drones in 2017, citing security concerns documented in classified reports, and the Department of Defense followed suit the next year. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:01 am by Bexis
Department of the Army, 696 A.2d 137, 145 (Pa. 1997) (“monitoring procedure exists”; “prescribed monitoring regime is reasonably necessary according to contemporary scientific principles”); Hansen v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
Magistrate Amy Reynolds Hay of Pittsburgh ruled Tuesday that PennEnvironment couldn’t prove that excessive discharge levels from Reliant Energy’s Conemaugh Generating Station near New Florence caused damage to the river. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am by Richard Altieri, Benjamin Della Rocca
” But the harms caused by the coronavirus in the United States are the result of a number of factors, so experts believe they likely do not meet this standard. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]