Search for: "CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY"
Results 61 - 70
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
In addition to the populations of Bikini and Enewetak, the people of Rongelap and Utirik were also affected by radioactive fallout from the largest nuclear test the United States has ever conducted, the Bravo test held March 1, 1954. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
It proposes to dismantle or radically overhaul the Departments of Justice and State; eliminate the Departments of Homeland Security, Education, and Commerce; radically repurpose other agencies; and eviscerate the professional civil service. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
July 29, 2019: Capital One issues a public announcement concerning the data breach, which affected approximately 100 million individuals in the United States and approximately 6 million in Canada. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
He recalls an Arabic flyer prepared by the State Department after the Cole bombing and distributed on the ground in Yemen, that erroneously told locals not to cooperate with Americans. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
That’s why LAO LAW at Legal Aid Ontario (LAO) is the best centralized legal research unit (CLR unit) in the legal profession in Canada. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
