Search for: "CAUTION, LTD. v. City of New York"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2018, 6:28 pm
A constitutional challenge was raised almost immediately in East York (Borough) v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 5:00 pm
[25] Brief for the Association of the Bar of the City of New York as Amicus Curiae In Support of Appellant and Reversal, page 2. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
” Monkton Insurance Services., Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm
The New York Times remained unimpressed, stating, “So now we get to replace Oxford comma pedantry with semicolon pedantry. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (Purolator Courier Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
— Richard Burgess, The Advocate, October 29, 2009 The city has agreed to build a new sewage treatment system that utilizes wetlands to clean wastewater and pay a $50,000 penalty to end a 9-year-old federal Clean Water Act lawsuit, according to court documents. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
--Developing a New Course--"Elements of Law"--"Elements of Law" Course 2.0: A Framework Course for the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Vancouver (City), McLachlin J. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
City of Stamford, 699 A.2d 52, 55 & n.8 (Conn. 1997). [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:29 pm
V. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
” Although the test’s threshold is viewed as relatively low, not all cases justify removal, and where the state opposes removal and offers persuasive reasons for why Mesa is not satisfied, the burden is very much on the removing party to provide specific reasons as to why the test is met.[6] The Mesa test remains good law and applies to all removals under section 1442.[7] “Although the statute is ‘liberally construed’… the Supreme Court has cautioned… [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Since then, district courts in the Southern District of New York have evaluated scheme liability under Rio Tinto, but there have been no further opinions discussing the scope of Lorenzo in the other circuits. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
Changes include: (i) provisions specifically tailored to evolving markets such as life science transactions and cryptocurrency- and blockchain-related offerings; (ii) enhanced ethical and legal standards, such as inclusion in the Investor Rights Agreement of a covenant requiring adoption of a workplace code of conduct and anti-harassment policies; and (iii) adaptations to legal developments, such as new drafting options in response to the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act (2015), offering more… [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s: SEC v. [read post]
