Search for: "CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
Examples of such obligations include the privacy and data security rules of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA), the Internal Revenue Code and other tax laws, federal and state consumer debt and information, electronic crime, data security and identity theft statutes; federal and state trade secret and intellectual property laws; and others, for which violations often equal or substantially exceed the civil monetary penalty liability that commonly arise… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
., to resolve Department of Health & Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) charges that Anthem, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
It further held that the County’s action was unsupported by substantial evidence because the efficiency metric threshold relied on statewide standards for GHG emissions reductions and did not provide sufficient evidence explaining why this metric was appropriate for use by projects in the County, specifically, as required by Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am
Human Resources and Other Matters Title I provides a few amendments to the position of Chief Human Capital Resources Officer and requires the secretary to produce an action plan within 180 days detailing how to improve employee engagement, diversity, inclusion and development. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
It states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be…subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial ass [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Part I of this paper analyzes the ways that researchers, particularly in the United States, have attempted to define and identify cases of wrongful conviction. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:35 am
., Director, Association of Village Council Presidents Tribal Justice Center BETHEL, AK – The announcement of A.D., et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am
United States Fish & Wildlife – 5/26/15. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of Woodland, Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:35 am
Waxman Statement on Supreme Court's Decision in UARG v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:09 pm
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
